MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319440815 · doi:10.4000/teth.5109

Safatle Vladimir, Silva Junior Nelson da, Dunker Christian (dir.). Néolibéralisme comme gestion de la souffrance psychique, Belo Horizonte, Autêntica, 2021.

2022· article· fr· W4319440815 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marina Duarte

Bibliographic record

VenueTerrains/Théories · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Development and Societal Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dirigé par Vladimir Safatle, Nelson da Silva Junior et Christian Dunker, ce livre fait partie d'un ensemble de travaux contemporains consacrés à la réflexion sur le néolibéralisme en tant que nouvelle forme de gouvernement. Il s'inscrit dans ce débat transnational, et dialogue étroitement avec la pensée de Michel Foucault, Christian Laval, Pierre Dardot, David Harvey et bien d'autres. La contribution spécifique du livre, sa thèse centrale, est que le néolibéralisme génère et gère une nouvelle...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTerrains/ThéoriesSame topicUrban Development and Societal IssuesFrench-language works237,207