Likelihood inference for Birnbaum–Saunders frailty model with an application to bone marrow transplant data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cluster failure time data are commonly encountered in survival analysis due to unobservable factors such as shared environmental conditions and genetic similarity. In such cases, careful attention needs to be paid to the correlation among the subjects within the same cluster. In addition, some diseases are curable due to the advancement of modern medical techniques. In this paper, we extend the frailty model based on Birnbaum–Saunders frailty distribution to incorporate the cure proportion. In addition, the marginal likelihood approach using Monte Carlo approximation and Expectation-Maximization algorithm are also developed for the determination of the maximum likelihood estimates of the parameters of the proposed model. An extensive simulation study is carried out to evaluate the performance of the proposed model and the methods of inference. Finally, the proposed model is applied to a real data set to analyse the effect of allogeneic and autologous bone marrow transplant treatment on acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it