MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319450772 · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2023.48500

Healthcare Monitoring System for Remote Areas

2023· article· en· W4319450772 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGadgetRemote patient monitoringComputer scienceNode (physics)TelemedicineMedical emergencyHealth careWork (physics)MedicineReal-time computingEngineeringNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Doctors now place a high importance on ongoing patient health monitoring since it gives them the chance to save a patient's life. So, the primary objective is to develop a patient monitoring system that can monitor a patient's various physiological data when they are in a remote location and provide the doctor with this information in real time. The information is made public online so that any doctor in the globe can access it. The necessity for a patient to visit the doctor is lessened via remote patient monitoring. The Raspberry Pi employed here is not only a sensor node but also a CPU, and IOT plays a significant part in this complete system by delivering several apps and services. This data can be sensed, gathered, and published online by an intelligent gadget. The paper suggests a general health monitoring system utilising a neural network-based HDPS (Heart Disease Prediction System). The HDPS system forecasts a patient's risk of developing heart disease. The technique uses medical parameters like sex, blood pressure, age, height, and weight for prediction. as an improvement over the work done in this area up until now.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.327
GPT teacher head0.576
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it