MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319458806 · doi:10.18671/scifor.v51.12

Heartwood-Sapwood-Bark profiles and association studies in Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb., a vulnerable antidiabetic forestry species of sub- tropical forest

2023· article· en· W4319458806 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Naseer Mohammad, Sengodan Saravanan, Fatima Shirin

Bibliographic record

VenueScientia Forestalis · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicWood and Agarwood Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIndian Council of Forestry Research and EducationTerry Fox Research Institute
KeywordsBark (sound)ForestryTropical forestBotanyBiologyGeographyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb. is a multipurpose forestry species of the sub-tropical region of the Indian subcontinent and its heartwood is known for excellent antidiabetic properties. However, due to unsustainable extraction, its populations are dwindling in natural ranges. In the present investigation, we studied the variations of heartwood and related characters in populations sampled from central India. For this, we sampled populations from different sites falling in mixed and sal forest of the central Indian state of Madhya Pradesh. Adaptive cluster sampling was followed for selection of study sites. Wood core samples were extracted at breast height using a Haglof three-thread increment borer. For each core, we measured bark thickness, sapwood thickness, heartwood diameter (cm), bark (%), sapwood (%), heartwood (%), sapwood area, heartwood area, sapwood area to heartwood area ratio and cross-sectional area. The analysis revealed that bark thickness ranged from 1.0 – 3.6 cm with an average of 2.21 cm; sapwood thickness from 2.0 – 12.0 cm with an average of 6.16 cm; heartwood diameter from 7.29 – 102.19 cm with an average of 36.77 cm. Bark, sapwood and heartwood percentages at breast height ranged from 1.37-31.9%, 1.96-45.97%, 39.23-96.68% with a mean value of 6.34%, 17.80% and 75.86%, respectively. Sapwood area, heartwood area and cross section area at breast height was also estimated and these parameters ranged from 39.76–1043 cm², 41.68–8197.6 cm² and 161.2–9476.5 cm², respectively. Despite its vulnerable status, P. marsupium populations recorded high variations for heartwood and related parameters. Correlation and path coefficient analysis revealed that bark (%), sapwood (%) and cross-sectional area are the most significant characters having a bearing on the heartwood percentage and could be utilised for selection, improvement and exploitation of heartwood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientia ForestalisSame topicWood and Agarwood ResearchFrench-language works237,207