Static Metasurface Reflectors With Independent Magnitude and Phase Control Using Coupled Resonator Configuration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A static metasurface reflector based on a novel coupled resonator configuration is proposed to independently control the reflection phase and magnitude of linearly polarized incident fields and is demonstrated experimentally in the millimeter-wave Ka-band around 30 GHz. The proposed concept is illustrated using a unit cell design consisting of a rectangular ring coupled with a rectangular slot resonator backed by a grounded dielectric slab. By geometrically tuning various dimensions of the two resonators, a near-perfect amplitude–phase coverage is achieved at a fixed design frequency of 30 GHz. To demonstrate the flexible beam-forming capability of the proposed metasurface reflectors, illustrative examples of fixed beam steering with varying reflection magnitudes and asymmetric dual-beam patterns with specified reflection magnitude, reflection angles, and beamwidths are successfully shown. Compared to the standard method based on polarization rotation and resistive loadings with discrete values, the proposed technique does not generate undesired cross-polarization field reflection and provides continuous magnitude tuning including full absorption, along with wide phase coverage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".