MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319459907 · doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.12.009

Too Little of a Good Thing

2023· article· en· W4319459907 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen Foulkes, Erin J. Howden, Hayley T. Dillon, Kristel Janssens, Rhys I. Beaudry, A Mitchell, Anniina Lindqvist, Imogen Wallace, Leah Wright, B. Costello, Guido Claessen, Mark J. Haykowsky, André La Gerche

Bibliographic record

VenueJACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilWorld Cancer Research FundWorld Cancer Research Fund International
KeywordsCardiologyInternal medicineQuartileMedicineVentricleStroke volumeCardiorespiratory fitnessCardiac function curveDiastoleCardiac outputHeart failureVO2 maxEjection fractionHeart rateHemodynamicsBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.064
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.064
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.008
Scholarly communication0.0090.009
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0090.024
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.032

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJACC. Cardiovascular imagingSame topicCardiovascular and exercise physiologyFrench-language works237,207