Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors of the Brachial Plexus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The incidence of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) is 0.001%. Commonly, MPNST arise in neurofibromatosis; however, they can occur sporadically, de novo or from a preexisting neurofibroma. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors are aggressive tumors with high rates of local recurrence and metastasis. The prognosis is poor with 5-year survival rates of 15% to 50%. Unfortunately, given the rarity of these tumors, it is not clear how to best manage these patients. The purposes of this study were (1) to discuss our experience with MPNST and particularly our difficulties with diagnosis and management, and (2) to review the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report on all tumors of the brachial plexus excised between 2013 and 2019. We report 3 cases of MPNST, their treatment, and their outcomes. RESULTS: Thirteen patients underwent surgical excision of an intrinsic brachial plexus mass. Three of these patients (2 male, 1 female; average age, 36 years) were diagnosed with an MPNST. Two patients with an MPNST had neurofibromatosis type 1. All patients with an MPNST had a tumor >8 cm, motor and sensory deficits, and pain. All 3 patients with MPNST underwent a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before diagnosis. The average time from initial symptom onset to MRI was 12.3 months. Only 1 of the MRIs suggested a malignant tumor, with no MRI identifying an MPNST. One patient underwent an excisional biopsy, and 2 had incisional biopsies. Because of the lack of diagnosis preoperatively, all patients had positive margins given the limited extent of surgery. Returning for excision in an attempt to achieve negative margins in a large oncologically contaminated field was not possible because defining the boundaries of the initial surgical field was unachievable; therefore, the initial surgery was their definitive surgical management. All patients were referred to oncology and received radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors must be suspected in enlarging masses (>5 cm) with the constellation of pain, motor, and sensory deficits. Computed tomography- or ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy under brachial plexus block or sedation is required for definitive diagnosis to allow for a comprehensive approach to the patient's tumor with a higher likelihood of disease-free survival.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".