MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4319461679 · doi:10.1113/jp283976

<i>In silico</i> analysis of the dynamic regulation of cardiac electrophysiology by K<sub>v</sub>11.1 ion‐channel trafficking

2023· article· en· W4319461679 on OpenAlexaff
Stefan Meier, Adaïa Grundland, Dobromir Dobrev, Paul G.A. Volders, Jordi Heijman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteZonMwEuropean Commission
KeywordshERGDofetilideElectrophysiologyGatingIon channelCardiac electrophysiologyInternalizationChemistryPotassium channelBiophysicsRepolarizationMembrane potentialInternal medicinePharmacologyMedicineBiologyQT intervalReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cardiac electrophysiology is regulated by continuous trafficking and internalization of ion channels occurring over minutes to hours. Kv11.1 (also known as hERG) underlies the rapidly activating delayed‐rectifier K+ current (IKr), which plays a major role in cardiac ventricular repolarization. Experimental characterization of the distinct temporal effects of genetic and acquired modulators on channel trafficking and gating is challenging. Computer models are instrumental in elucidating these effects, but no currently available model incorporates ion‐channel trafficking. Here, we present a novel computational model that reproduces the experimentally observed production, forward trafficking, internalization, recycling and degradation of Kv11.1 channels, as well as their modulation by temperature, pentamidine, dofetilide and extracellular K+. The acute effects of these modulators on channel gating were also incorporated and integrated with the trafficking model in the O'Hara–Rudy human ventricular cardiomyocyte model. Supraphysiological dofetilide concentrations substantially increased Kv11.1 membrane levels while also producing a significant channel block. However, clinically relevant concentrations did not affect trafficking. Similarly, severe hypokalaemia reduced Kv11.1 membrane levels based on long‐term culture data, but had limited effect based on short‐term data. By contrast, clinically relevant elevations in temperature acutely increased IKr due to faster kinetics, while after 24 h, IKr was decreased due to reduced Kv11.1 membrane levels. The opposite was true for lower temperatures. Taken together, our model reveals a complex temporal regulation of cardiac electrophysiology by temperature, hypokalaemia, and dofetilide through competing effects on channel gating and trafficking, and provides a framework for future studies assessing the role of impaired trafficking in cardiac arrhythmias. image Key points Kv11.1 channels underlying the rapidly activating delayed‐rectifier K+ current are important for ventricular repolarization and are continuously shuttled from the cytoplasm to the plasma membrane and back over minutes to hours. Kv11.1 gating and trafficking are modulated by temperature, drugs and extracellular K+ concentration but experimental characterization of their combined effects is challenging. Computer models may facilitate these analyses, but no currently available model incorporates ion‐channel trafficking. We introduce a new two‐state ion‐channel trafficking model able to reproduce a wide range of experimental data, along with the effects of modulators of Kv11.1 channel functioning and trafficking. The model reveals complex dynamic regulation of ventricular repolarization by temperature, extracellular K+ concentration and dofetilide through opposing acute (millisecond) effects on Kv11.1 gating and long‐term (hours) modulation of Kv11.1 trafficking. This in silico trafficking framework provides a tool to investigate the roles of acute and long‐term processes on arrhythmia promotion and maintenance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physiology→Same topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias→French-language works237,207→