MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319586681 · doi:10.1109/icdmw58026.2022.00041

Domain-Specific Deep Learning Feature Extractor for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Detection

2022· article· en· W4319586681 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Basiri, Miloš R. Popović, Shehroz S. Khan

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtractorComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceDiabetic footFeature extractionClassifier (UML)Diabetic foot ulcerDeep learningPopulationFeature (linguistics)Machine learningPattern recognition (psychology)MedicineDiabetes mellitusEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU) is a condition requiring constant monitoring and evaluations for treatment. DFU patient population is on the rise and will soon outpace the available health resources. Autonomous monitoring and evaluation of DFU wounds is a much-needed area in health care. In this paper, we evaluate and identify the most accurate feature extractor that is the core basis for developing a deep learning wound detection network. For the evaluation, we used mAP and F1-score on the publicly available DFU2020 dataset. A combination of UNet and EfficientNetb3 feature extractor resulted in the best evaluation among the 14 networks compared. UNet and Efficientnetb3 can be used as the classifier in the development of a comprehensive DFU domain-specific autonomous wound detection pipeline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)Same topicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207