Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Journal de Marie Uguay se présente comme un accès privilégié à l’expérience intime que vit l’écrivaine alors que la mort promise par la maladie permet l’émergence de réflexions qui façonnent autant un nouveau rapport au monde qu’un rapport à soi transformé. Si, par le statut posthume du Journal, le lectorat connaît déjà la finalité de l’oeuvre, il n’en demeure pas moins que le bouleversement engendré par la maladie et la mort dévoile chez Uguay une part d’agentivité puisque l’acte d’écrire lui permet de rejouer son sort selon ses propres modalités. Ainsi, cet article propose de se pencher sur la thématique de la mort tant au sein du Journal d’Uguay que dans sa réception critique. Plus précisément, il sera question d’aborder l’écriture à la fois comme une reprise de pouvoir sur la vie et une lutte pour celle-ci.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".