Characterization of the immune cell landscape in CRC: Clinical implications of tumour-infiltrating leukocytes in early- and late-stage CRC
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Tumour-infiltrating leukocytes play an important role in cancers, including CRC. We therefore sought to characterize the impact of tumour-infiltrating leukocytes on CRC prognosis. Methods: To determine whether the immune cell profile within CRC tissue could influence prognosis, we employed three computational methodologies (CIBERSORT, xCell and MCPcounter) to predict abundance of immune cell types, based on gene expression. This was done using two patient cohorts, TCGA and BC Cancer Personalized OncoGenomics (POG). Results: We observed significant differences in immune cell composition between CRC and normal adjacent colon tissue, as well as differences in based on method of analysis. Evaluation of survival based on immune cell types revealed dendritic cells as a positive prognostic marker, consistently across methodologies. Mast cells were also found to be a positive prognostic marker, but in a stage-dependent manner. Unsupervised cluster analysis demonstrated that significant differences in immune cell composition has a more pronounced effect on prognosis in early-stage CRC, compared to late-stage CRC. This analysis revealed a distinct group of individuals with early-stage CRC which have an immune infiltration signature that indicates better survival probability. Conclusions: Taken together, characterization of the immune landscape in CRC has provided a powerful tool to assess prognosis. We anticipate that further characterization of the immune landscape will facilitate use of immunotherapies in CRC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".