MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319594570 · doi:10.1093/rcfs/cfad002

How Does Corporate Governance Affect Equity Volatility? Worldwide Evidence and Theory

2023· article· en· W4319594570 on OpenAlexaff
Louis Gagnon, Alexandre Jeanneret

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Review of Corporate Finance Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Finance and Governance
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpropriationCorporate governanceEquity (law)Volatility (finance)ShareholderMonetary economicsEconomicsProfitability indexBusinessCost of equityAccountingFinancial economicsFinanceCost of capitalMarket economyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We investigate the causal impact of corporate governance on equity volatility in a quasi-natural experimental setting by exploiting the staggered passage of governance reforms in the past 25 years. Using a sample of 33,831 firms from 48 countries, we find that equity volatility drops by one-fifth following the passage of reforms that increase board independence. This effect is driven by an adjustment in fixed operating costs as managerial expropriation decreases, rather than by changes in firms’ investments, profitability, asset risk, or financing decisions. We rationalize these findings with a model in which minority shareholders are subject to sticky managerial expropriation. (JEL G12, G32, G34)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Review of Corporate Finance StudiesSame topicCorporate Finance and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207