Recent Advances in Infrared Face Analysis and Recognition with Deep Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Besides the many advances made in the facial detection and recognition fields, face recognition applied to visual images (VIS-FR) has received increasing interest in recent years, especially in the field of communication, identity authentication, public safety and to address the risk of terrorism and crime. These systems however encounter important problems in the presence of variations in pose, expression, age, occlusion, disguise, and lighting as these factors significantly reduce the recognition accuracy. To prevent problems in the visible spectrum, several researchers have recommended the use of infrared images. This paper provides an updated overview of deep infrared (IR) approaches in face recognition (FR) and analysis. First, we present the most widely used databases, both public and private, and the various metrics and loss functions that have been proposed and used in deep infrared techniques. We then review deep face analysis and recognition/identification methods proposed in recent years. In this review, we show that infrared techniques have given interesting results for face recognition, solving some of the problems encountered with visible spectrum techniques. We finally identify some weaknesses of current infrared FR approaches as well as many future research directions to address the IR FR limitations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".