MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319596421 · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-29354-w

Author Correction: A high-throughput skim-sequencing approach for genotyping, dosage estimation and identifying translocations

2023· erratum· en· W4319596421 on OpenAlexaff
Laxman Adhikari, Sandesh Shrestha, Wu Shuangye, Jared Crain, Liangliang Gao, Byron Evers, Duane Wilson, Yoonha Ju, Dal‐Hoe Koo, Pierre Hucl, Curtis Pozniak, Sean Walkowiak, Xiaoyun Wang, Jing Wu, Jeffrey C. Glaubitz, Lee R. DeHaan, Bernd Friebe, Jesse Poland

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2023
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiological Research and Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenotypingThroughputChromosomal translocationComputer scienceEstimationComputational biologyGeneticsBiologyGenotypeGeneTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The original version of this Article contained an error, where the quantity of TDE1 Tagment DNA Enzyme was incorrectly given as 0.9966 μl instead of 0.09966 μl in the Materials and Methods section under the subheading “Plant material and germplasm - Library construction”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicBiological Research and Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207