The Relationship between Working Memory and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescents and Relevant Interventions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Major depressive disorder can have a serious negative impact on the cognitive functioning of adolescents, while most existing research focused on the biological, genetic and social factors of major depressive disorder. Working memory is a system related to the manipulation of short-term memory and is part of what constitutes human cognition. The current study reviewed the recent studies exploring the relationship between working memory and major depressive disorder in adolescents and related applications for treatment. As a result, in general, the ability of working memory was negatively associated with major depression, accompanied by negative correlations between it with various relevant factors and depressive symptoms. Also, intervening the working memory could alleviate major depression in adolescents. This paper only provided a generalized discussion regarding the relationship between working memory and depressive symptoms, while the interactions and specific associations of internal systems of working memory with depressive symptoms are expected to be confirmed in the future research. This review can contribute to future research on the relationship between specific working memory systems and mood disorders from a cognitive psychology perspective. It can also provide some suggestions to the design of prevention and intervention programs for depression at schools.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".