Bibliographic record
Abstract
Substance abuse among adolescents is a significant concern today. Alcohol, as the most accessible addictive substance, is also the most likely to lead to adolescent alcohol consumption and eventually to the development of alcohol addiction. Alcohol addiction in adolescents can have harmful, even long-lasting effects on their psychology and physiology. Previous literatures have examined factors contributing to adolescent alcohol addiction from multiple perspectives. However, there are relatively fewer systematic reviews of family and peer influences on adolescent alcohol abuse. Therefore, this article aims to integrate the findings of previous literatures and address the impact of family and peers on adolescent alcohol consumption and alcohol addiction. Parents’ and peers’ open attitudes toward alcohol, negative peer and parent-child relationship, unhappy marital status, as well as peers’ problematic behaviors could assumably increase the likelihood of adolescent alcohol use. By discussing and analyzing two kinds of intimate relationships of adolescents, family and peers, this paper calls for social institutions to devote more attention to adolescent drinking behavior and their social relationships to prevent adolescent alcohol addiction and the harm caused by alcohol abuse. In addition, previous studies were mostly correlational cross-sectional studies, which had some limitations. Future studies could focus on longitudinal experiments and consider excluding confounding factors to obtain causal results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".