Corrigendum: Small steps for mankind: Modeling the emergence of cumulative culture from joint active inference communication
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Incorrect Funding5 In the published article, there was an error in the Funding statement with regards to the omission of6 the Wellcome Trust Principal Research Fellowship (KJF; Ref. 088130/Z/09/Z). The original text was:7 ”This research was undertaken thanks in part to funding from a NWO Research Talent Grant of the Dutch8 Government (CH; No. 406.18.535).” The correct Funding statement appears below.9 FUNDING10 This research was undertaken thanks in part to funding from a NWO Research Talent Grant of the Dutch11 Government (CH; No. 406.18.535) and by a Wellcome Trust Principal Research Fellowship (KJF; Ref.12 088130/Z/09/Z).13 The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the14 article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it