MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319657241 · doi:10.1093/gbe/evad010

Mitonuclear Interactions and the Origin of Macaque Societies

2023· article· en· W4319657241 on OpenAlexafffund
Jian-long Zhu, Ben J. Evans

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome Biology and Evolution · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPrimate Behavior and Ecology
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCompute Canada
KeywordsBiologyMacaqueNatural selectionGeneticsEvolutionary biologyGenomeGeneMitochondrial DNASexual dimorphismRhesus macaqueSelection (genetic algorithm)ZoologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In most eukaryotes, aerobic respiration requires interactions between autosomally encoded genes (Ninteract genes) and mitochondrial DNA, RNA, and protein. In species where females are philopatric, contrasting distributions of genetic variation in mitochondrial and nuclear genomes create variation in mitonuclear interactions that may be subject to natural selection. To test this expectation, we turned to a group with extreme female philopatry: the macaque monkeys. We examined four genomic data sets from (1) wild caught and (2) captive populations of rhesus macaque, which is the most widely distributed nonhuman primate, and (3) the stump-tailed macaque and (4) a subspecies of longtail macaque, both of whose mitochondrial DNA is introgressed from a highly diverged ancestor. We identified atypically long runs of homozygosity, low polymorphism, high differentiation, and/or rapid protein evolution associated with Ninteract genes compared with non-Ninteract genes. These metrics suggest a subset of Ninteract genes were independently subject to atypically pervasive natural selection in multiple species. These findings suggest that natural selection on mitonuclear interactions could have influenced several aspects of macaque societies including species diversity, ecological breadth, female-biased adult sex ratio and demography, sexual dimorphism, and mitonuclear phylogenomics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.569
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome Biology and EvolutionSame topicPrimate Behavior and EcologyFrench-language works237,207