MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319660780 · doi:10.1159/000528121

Embryonal Sarcoma of the Liver in the Adult: Challenges in the Diagnosis of a Rare Entity

2023· article· en· W4319660780 on OpenAlexaff
Guilherme Nogueira Fontinha, João Martins Gama, Rui Caetano Oliveira, Augusta Cipriano

Bibliographic record

VenueGE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Canadian institutionsCytodiagnostics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathologyImmunophenotypingVimentinMedicineImmunostainingSarcomaHyalineClear-cell sarcomaImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Embryonal sarcoma of the liver (ESL) is a rare neoplasm of the liver occurring mainly in paediatric ages. Making the correct diagnosis can be challenging as the laboratory and radiological findings that are often nonspecific, and the tumour immunophenotype is poorly defined and even somewhat variable. Case Presentation: A large epigastric mass was detected in a computerized tomography scan of a 43-year-old woman presenting with abdominal pain and bloating. The mass was biopsied and submitted to histopathological study. Microscopically the tumour had sarcomatoid features and showed multinucleated cells with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS)-positive globules. Immunostaining revealed positivity for vimentin, CD10, glypican-3, and α1-antitrypsin and negativity for keratins, muscle, adipocytic, and melanocytic differentiation markers. The patient was then submitted to a left hepatectomy with similar histological findings. Discussion: ESL in adults is a rarity and its diagnosis requires the exclusion of other entities. While some microscopic features are very common, they remain nonspecific. The main feature is the presence of multinucleated cells with PAS-positive hyaline globules. While ancillary testing is key, the immunophenotype also lacks specificity and ESL may have variable staining for glypican-3 and epithelial or muscle differentiation markers. Although it has been described for more than 3 decades, the prognosis and optimal treatment are still not well defined, but surgery has yielded favourable results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGE Portuguese Journal of GastroenterologySame topicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisFrench-language works237,207