MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319778765 · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2023.3238729

Automatic Metric Search for Few-Shot Learning

2023· article· en· W4319778765 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Canadian institutionsVector InstituteWestern University
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceMetric (unit)Artificial intelligenceTask (project management)Class (philosophy)Machine learningDomain (mathematical analysis)Sample (material)Shot (pellet)Space (punctuation)Function (biology)Data miningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Few-shot learning (FSL) aims to learn a model that can identify unseen classes using only a few training samples from each class. Most of the existing FSL methods adopt a manually predefined metric function to measure the relationship between a sample and a class, which usually require tremendous efforts and domain knowledge. In contrast, we propose a novel model called automatic metric search (Auto-MS), in which an Auto-MS space is designed for automatically searching task-specific metric functions. This allows us to further develop a new searching strategy to facilitate automated FSL. More specifically, by incorporating the episode-training mechanism into the bilevel search strategy, the proposed search strategy can effectively optimize the network weights and structural parameters of the few-shot model. Extensive experiments on the miniImageNet and tieredImageNet datasets demonstrate that the proposed Auto-MS achieves superior performance in FSL problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it