MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Reply on RC1

2023· peer-review· en· W4319792454 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Nasrin Mostafavipak

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaThe Scarborough Hospital
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space AgencyJet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversity of TorontoConnaught FundCanadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric SciencesOntario Innovation TrustGovernment of CanadaNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNova Scotia Research Innovation Trust
KeywordsSuns in alchemyEnvironmental scienceTrace gasSatelliteSCIAMACHYAtmospheric sciencesMeteorologyRemote sensingTropospherePhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. EM27/SUNs are portable solar-viewing Fourier Transform Spectrometers (FTSs) that are being widely used to constrain measurements of greenhouse gas emissions and validate satellite trace gas measurements. On a six-week-long campaign in the summer of 2018, four EM27/SUNs were taken to five Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) stations in North America to measure side-by-side to better understand their durability, as well as the accuracy and precision of retrievals from their trace gas measurements and to constrain site-to-site bias among TCCON sites. We developed new EM27/SUN data products using both previous and current versions of the retrieval algorithm (GGG2014 and GGG2020) and used coincident AirCore measurements to tie the gas retrievals to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) trace gas standard scales. We also derived airmass-dependent correction factors for the EM27/SUNs. Pairs of column-averaged dry-air mole fractions (denoted with an X) measured by the EM27/SUNs remained consistent compared to each other during the entire campaign, with a 10-minute averaged precision of 0.3 ppm for XCO2, 1.7 ppb for XCH4 and 2.5 ppb for XCO. The maximum biases between TCCON stations were reduced in GGG2020 relative to GGG2014 from 1.3 ppm to 0.5 ppm for XCO2 and from 5.4 ppb to 4.3 for XCH4 but increased for XCO from 2.2 to 6.1 ppb. The increased XCO biases in GGG2020 are driven by measurements at sites influenced by urban emissions (Caltech and AFRC) where the priors overestimate surface CO. In addition in 2020, one EM27/SUN instrument was sent to the Canadian Arctic TCCON station at Eureka and side-by-side measurements were performed in March–July. In contrast to the other TCCON stations that showed an improvement in the biases with the newer version of GGG, the biases between Eureka's TCCON measurements and those from the EM27/SUN degraded with GGG2020, but this degradation was found to be caused by a temperature dependence in the EM27/SUN oxygen retrievals that is not apparent in the GGG2014 retrievals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0280.024
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1810.153

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics→French-language works237,207→