Linear-depth quantum circuits for loading Fourier approximations of arbitrary functions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ability to efficiently load functions on quantum computers with high fidelity is essential for many quantum algorithms. We introduce the Fourier Series Loader (FSL) method for preparing quantum states that exactly encode multi-dimensional Fourier series using linear-depth quantum circuits. The FSL method prepares a ($Dn$)-qubit state encoding the $2^{Dn}$-point uniform discretization of a $D$-dimensional function specified by a $D$-dimensional Fourier series. A free parameter $m < n$ determines the number of Fourier coefficients, $2^{D(m+1)}$, used to represent the function. The FSL method uses a quantum circuit of depth at most $2(n-2)+\lceil \log_{2}(n-m) \rceil + 2^{D(m+1)+2} -2D(m+1)$, which is linear in the number of Fourier coefficients, and linear in the number of qubits ($Dn$) despite the fact that the loaded function's discretization is over exponentially many ($2^{Dn}$) points. We present a classical compilation algorithm with runtime $O(2^{3D(m+1)})$ to determine the FSL circuit for a given Fourier series. The FSL method allows for the highly accurate loading of complex-valued functions that are well-approximated by a Fourier series with finitely many terms. We report results from noiseless quantum circuit simulations, illustrating the capability of the FSL method to load various continuous 1D functions, and a discontinuous 1D function, on 20 qubits with infidelities of less than $10^{-6}$ and $10^{-3}$, respectively. We also demonstrate the practicality of the FSL method for near-term quantum computers by presenting experiments performed on the Quantinuum H$1$-$1$ and H$1$-$2$ trapped-ion quantum computers: we loaded a complex-valued function on 3 qubits with a fidelity of over $95\%$, as well as various 1D real-valued functions on up to 6 qubits with classical fidelities $\approx 99\%$, and a 2D function on 10 qubits with a classical fidelity $\approx 94\%$.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".