MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319827636 · doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkad033

Population-size history inferences from the coho salmon ( <i>Oncorhynchus kisutch</i> ) genome

2023· article· en· W4319827636 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Éric Rondeau, Kris A. Christensen, David R. Minkley, Jong S. Leong, Michelle Chan, Cody A Despins, Anita Mueller, Dionne Sakhrani, Carlo A. Biagi, Quentin Rougemont, Éric Normandeau, Steven J.M. Jones, Robert H. Devlin, Ruth E. Withler, Terry D. Beacham, Kerry A. Naish, José M. Yáñez, Roberto Neira, Louis Bernatchez, William S. Davidson, Ben F. Koop

Bibliographic record

VenueG3 Genes Genomes Genetics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversité LavalSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of VictoriaFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationCompute CanadaCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreGenome CanadaMcGill UniversitySimon Fraser UniversityWashington State UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMassachusetts Department of Fish and Game
KeywordsOncorhynchusSpawn (biology)BiologyPopulation bottleneckDemographic historyEffective population sizeFisheryPopulationGene flowEcologyGenetic variationDemographyMicrosatelliteFish <Actinopterygii>Genetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) are a culturally and economically important species that return from multiyear ocean migrations to spawn in rivers that flow to the Northern Pacific Ocean. Southern stocks of coho salmon in Canada and the United States have significantly declined over the past quarter century, and unfortunately, conservation efforts have not reversed this trend. To assist in stock management and conservation efforts, we generated a chromosome-level genome assembly. We also resequenced the genomes of 83 coho salmon across the North American range to identify nucleotide variants and understand the demographic histories of these salmon by modeling effective population size from genome-wide data. From demographic history modeling, we observed reductions in effective population sizes between 3,750 and 8,000 years ago for several northern sampling sites, which may correspond to bottleneck events during recolonization after glacial retreat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueG3 Genes Genomes GeneticsSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207