MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319839785 · doi:10.1177/10812865221147858

Finite element modelling of exponentially graded composites with microstructure

2023· article· en· W4319839785 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan Barrage, S. Potapenko, Maria Anna Polak

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics and Mechanics of Solids · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNumerical methods in engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite element methodElasticity (physics)Boundary value problemMicrostructureMaterials scienceComposite numberComposite materialMathematicsMathematical analysisStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Composite material properties are dependent on their microstructure. To adequately model these microstructural effects, a formulation of elasticity that accounts for microstructural effects must be considered. Size-dependent behaviour is an inherent property of such materials, resulting in a need for non-classical continuum theories for adequate characterization. A three-dimensional model for an exponentially graded composite with microstructural effects is developed under the framework of Cosserat elasticity. The mixed boundary value problem is formulated and solved through the finite element method, and implemented in the commercial software Abaqus through two user developed elements. Recovery of the classical limit for the Dirichlet problem is discussed as an initial model validation until complete experimental measurements can be conducted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematics and Mechanics of SolidsSame topicNumerical methods in engineeringFrench-language works237,207