Plant Megafossils, Palynomorphs, and Paleoenvironment from the Late Middle to Late Eocene Burnaby Mountain Flora, Huntingdon Formation, British Columbia, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Premise of research. The Eocene fossil flora of the area around Vancouver, British Columbia, is poorly known despite work beginning in the 1890s to 1920s. The floristic character of the previously unstudied Burnaby Mountain flora from the Huntingdon Formation in British Columbia is reconstructed using plant megafossils and palynology. This site offers insight into the terrestrial vegetation and paleoclimate during the late middle to late Eocene of the Pacific Northwest of North America in a coastal setting during a global cooling trend.Methodology. Megaflora and microflora were identified, and the combined flora was compared with that of coeval floras from northwestern Washington. Paleoclimate was reconstructed from leaf morphology using the Climate Leaf Analysis Multivariate Program, leaf margin analysis, and leaf area analysis. A probabilistic nearest-living-relative approach was used to reconstruct paleoclimate independently of leaf morphology, using taxonomic identifications from both mega- and microfossils. These data were combined in an ensemble approach.Pivotal results. The Burnaby Mountain fossil flora is late middle Eocene to late Eocene in age and shares key plant taxa with the coeval Upper Ravenian flora of the Puget Group and the upper Chumstick Formation of northwestern Washington. The fossil flora contained a mix of subtropical and temperate forest elements, including rare palm and possible cycad leaf fragments, rare conifer pollen, and a diversity of broad-leaved trees.Conclusions. The reconstructed paleoclimate suggests humid warm-temperate to marginally subtropical conditions in coastal British Columbia during the late middle Eocene to late Eocene. An ensemble paleoclimate approach provided a most parsimonious mean annual temperature estimate of 16.2°C±3.1°C for the Burnaby Mountain fossils and mean annual precipitation of 134±56 cm. A modern climatic analog is present on the East Coast of the United States in North Carolina, where palms are part of the native flora.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".