On Model Transmission Strategies in Federated Learning With Lossy Communications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, federated learning (FL) has received tremendous attention in both academia and industry, in which decentralized clients collaboratively complete model training by exchanging model updates with a parameter server through the Internet. Its distributed nature well utilizes the localized data and preserves clients’ privacy, but also incurs heavy communication overhead. Existing studies on model update have mostly focused on the bandwidth constraint of the communication channels. Today's Internet however is highly unreliable. Simply using Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) would lead to low network utilization under frequent losses. In this paper, we closely examine the optimal transmission strategies in FL over the realistic lossy Internet. We systematically integrate model compression, forward error correction (FEC) and retransmission towards Federated Learning with Lossy Communications (FedLC). We derive the convergence rate of FedLC under non-convex loss with the optimal transmission. We then decompose this non-convex problem and present effective practical solutions. Public datasets are exploited for performance evaluation by varying the packet loss rate from 10% to 50%. In a fixed training time budget, FedLC can improve model accuracy by 3.91% on average or reduce the communication traffic by 34.27%-47.57% in comparison with state-of-the-art baselines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".