Nemesis: Neural Mean Teacher Learning-Based Emotion-Centric Speaker
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Image captioning is the multi-modal task of automatically describing a digital image based on its contents and their semantic relationship. This research area has gained increasing popularity over the past few years; however, most of the previous studies have been focused on purely objective content-based descriptions of the image scenes. In this study, efforts have been made to generate more engaging captions by leveraging human-like emotional responses. To achieve this task, a mean teacher learning-based method has been applied to the recently introduced ArtEmis dataset. ArtEmis is the first large-scale dataset for emotion-centric image captioning, containing 455K emotional descriptions of 80K artworks from WikiArt. This method includes a self-distillation relationship between memory-augmented language models with meshed connectivity. These language models are trained in a cross-entropy phase and then fine-tuned in a self-critical sequence training phase. According to various popular natural language processing metrics, such as BLEU, METEOR, ROUGE-L, and CIDEr, our proposed model has obtained a new state of the art on ArtEmis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it