Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen:El estudio propone un razonamiento que pretende explorar la cuestin de la relacin entre digitalizacin del trabajo y participacin de las personas trabajadoras, con especial referencia al perfil especfico de la transparencia sobre los mecanismos de funcionamiento de los algoritmos y de los sistemas de inteligencia artificial aplicados a la organizacin del trabajo.En este sentido, se ha querido centrar la atencin en una institucin jurdica que parece emblemtica y paradigmtica, de cara a la promocin de una mayor participacin de las personas que trabajan en la empresa: los derechos de informacin y consulta, sobre "contenidos digitales".La tesis que se argumenta en el estudio podra, de hecho, sintetizarse en la visin de un "levantamiento del velo digital en el trabajo": la informacin de la representacin de las personas trabajadoras, sobre el ncleo ms oscuro de la digitalizacin (es decir los algoritmos), constituye la va maestra para la consecucin de un renovado planteamiento de la democracia en el trabajo; una renovacin que supone necesariamente una correccin y un reequilibrio de la acentuada asimetra informativa, propia de la relacin laboral digital.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it