MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319989824 · doi:10.1370/afm.21.s1.4388

How Echos Amplify: The Power of ECHO Rheumatology for Group Practice to Manage Inflammatory Arthritis & Autoimmune Disease

2023· article· en· W4319989824 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jane Zhao, Mandy McGlynn, Claire Bombardier, Joie Steiman Amanda

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRheumatologyMedicineMentorshipFamily medicineContext (archaeology)WorkforceSpecialtyFocus groupHealth careInternal medicinePhysical therapyMedical educationGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>CONTEXT:</h3> Project ECHO is a guided practice model that increases workforce capacity to provide best-practice specialty care and reduce health disparities. It is well-suited to rheumatology care delivery in Ontario, as the number of rheumatologists in the province has remained static despite the growing prevalence and burden of rheumatic disease. Consequently, there remain striking disparities in access to care, particularly in rural and remote areas across the province. ECHO Rheumatology (‘ECHO’) began in Ontario, Canada in 2017. ECHO fosters and supports rheumatic disease care champions within a Family Health Team (FHT), a type of primary care group practice in Ontario, Canada. <h3>OBJECTIVES:</h3> To present experiences of ECHO PCPs from FHTs that demonstrate how ECHO supports complex rheumatic disease management; to present metrics regarding impact of the program. <h3>STUDY DESIGN:</h3> We conducted a multi-method study including PCP questionnaires and focus groups. Focus groups were conducted to explore PCP experiences participating in ECHO, practice change, and interprofessional collaboration. <h3>ANALYSIS:</h3> Paired samples t-tests were calculated to examine pre-post changes. Focus group transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis. <h3>SETTING:</h3> Ontario, Canada <h3>STUDY POPULATION: ECHO PCPs OUTCOME MEASURES:</h3> Self-efficacy, knowledge, satisfaction, practice change. <h3>RESULTS:</h3> PCPs are increasing their interest and collaboration between other health professionals as a result of participating in ECHO. ECHO was also noted to foster Virtual Communities of Practice (VCoP) through weekly sessions and ongoing mentorship regarding rheumatic patient cases. PCPs were also highly satisfied with the program. One focus group participant said ““A fantastic program for us rural providers because of limited access to specialists.” In terms of questionnaire outcomes, all 16 items of self-efficacy questionnaire increased significantly (p&lt;0.005). Participants’ knowledge scores increased from 59% (SD 15%) pre-ECHO to 66% (SD 19%) post-ECHO (p=0.045). <h3>CONCLUSION:</h3> The prevalence and burden of rheumatic disease is rising. ECHO is a program in Ontario, Canada that has promise to build capacity within primary care, especially those practicing in group practices like Family Health Teams. In addition to increasing PCP self-efficacy and knowledge, ECHO has the potential to develop virtual communities of practice and increase interprofessional collaboration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMusculoskeletal Disorders and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207