MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319993335 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2023.3239823

Iterative Semi-Coherent Receiver for Coded LoRa Systems

2023· article· en· W4319993335 on OpenAlex
The Khai Nguyen, Ha H. Nguyen, Eric Salt

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDemodulationDecoding methodsAlgorithmChannel (broadcasting)Coding (social sciences)Electronic engineeringMathematicsTelecommunicationsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter presents a novel design of an iterative receiver for low-power long-range (LoRa) systems with channel coding and semi-coherent receiver. To enable soft-input-soft-output (SISO) decoding, closed-form expressions for the exact distribution of the received signal samples and the resulting log-likelihood ratios of the coded bits are obtained. Next, we propose an iterative semi-coherent receiver that performs iterative processing among the soft-output demodulator, the SISO channel decoder, and the blind channel estimator, i.e., without any training overhead. Simulation results show that our proposed receiver outperforms non-coherent receiver, and closely approaches the ideal coherent receiver’s performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.856
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it