Speed and Scalability of Ambipolar Deep-Subthreshold TFTs for Ultralow-Power Printed Electronics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work evaluates the speed and scalability potential of ambipolar deep-subthreshold printed-carbon-nanotube thin-film transistors (CNT-TFTs) for the design of ultralow-power CMOS-like circuits. Transistor and circuit simulations are developed based on experimental device measurements. Our simulations allow the assessment of this emerging printed electronics technology in terms of speed, energy/power consumption, and scalability to digital circuits of progressively higher transistor count including elementary logic gates, ring oscillators and other representative digital circuits. It is shown that digital circuits based on this technology are compatible with propagation delays <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\le 1$ </tex-math></inline-formula> ms per NOT logic gate, while operating at ultralow supply voltages (0.2 V) and with ultralow static power dissipation (1 pW). Finally, this study develops Monte Carlo simulations to assess the impact of device parameter variations on the viability of large-scale circuit integration based on ambipolar deep-subthreshold printed-CNT-TFTs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it