MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319998810 · doi:10.4000/communiquer.10128

En live sur Pitchfork : les performances multiples de la forme audiovisuelle

2022· article· fr· W4319998810 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Maxim Bonin

Bibliographic record

VenueCommuniquer Revue de communication sociale et publique · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À partir d’une analyse documentaire des productions audiovisuelles mises en ligne sur Pitchfork et des contenus qui en font la promotion, cet article propose d’explorer comment l’usage du live permet au webzine de légitimer son rôle comme composante créative au sein des industries de la musique. Comment les forces de modelages des plateformes numériques, tel que YouTube, ont-elles transformé les pratiques du webzine et les possibilités de création et de diffusion de productions audiovisuelles live? Cet article propose le concept de performance de la forme en explorant comment de multiples performances peuvent être attribuées à une forme culturelle donnée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommuniquer Revue de communication sociale et publiqueSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207