Sensitive Temperature Probes Detail Different Turbulence Processes in the Deep Mediterranean
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In addition to large-scale water flows and eddies, small-scale turbulent mixing distributes heat, water masses, and suspended matter in the deep sea. In contrast to turbulent mixing near the sea surface, which is driven by wind and waves and redistributes solar heat input, large-scale mixing in the deep sea occurs near steep underwater topography such as ridges, seamounts, and continental slopes. For example, above the continental slope in the Western Mediterranean Sea, boundary flows, (sub-)mesoscale eddies, and internal waves dominate water motions. In this area, wintertime dense-water formation, breaking of internal waves, and geothermal heating are associated with turbulent mixing. As a result, vertical stable density stratification is very weak. Detailed observations of turbulent mixing in the deep sea are rare and demand high-resolution instrumentation. This paper provides an overview of various types of deep Mediterranean turbulence observed using high-resolution temperature sensors, including weak turbulence resulting from stable internal waves in late summer and autumn, strong turbulence caused by geothermal heating from below in winter, and moderate turbulence induced by stratified waters pressing down from above during dense-water formation in late winter and spring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it