Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kieran Aarons teaches philosophy and interdisciplinary studies at Governors State University in Chicago.Giorgio Agamben is a contemporary Italian philosopher and political theorist whose works have been translated into numerous languages. His most recent book is L'irrealizzabile. Per una politica dell'ontologia (The Unrealizable: Toward a Politics of Ontology [2022]).Philippe Blouin is a PhD candidate in anthropology at McGill University. He published essays in Liaisons and Stasis and edited the forthcoming book The Mohawk Warrior Society: A Handbook on Sovereignty and Survival.Mikkel Bolt Rasmussen is professor of political aesthetics at the University of Copenhagen. He is the author of books on the Situationist International, politicized contemporary art, and the revolutionary tradition. His books have been translated into French, Italian, and Greek. His most recent book is Late Capitalist Fascism (2021).Rodrigo Karmy Bolton teaches classical Arab and contemporary philosophy in the Center for Arab Studies and the Department of Philosophy at the University of Chile. He is the author of numerous books, including The Future Is Inherited: Fragments of a Chile in Revolt (2022) and Intifada: Una topología de la imaginación popular (2020).Luhuna Carvalho's writing has appeared in Punkto magazine, Ill Will, and elsewhere. His writings on Italian political thought have recently appeared in Politics of the Many (2021) and La Rivoluzione in Esilio: Scritti su Mario Tronti (2021). He is currently preparing a book on Autonomia and operaismo. Depois da Lei, his first novel, was published in 2022.Alan Cruz is a doctoral student in political philosophy at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. His work focuses on contemporary revolutionary experiments based on Giorgio Agamben's political concepts of civil war and destituent power.Joost de Moor is an assistant professor at the Center for European Studies and Comparative Politics at Sciences Po Paris. His work on environmental and climate movements has been published in such journals as Environmental Politics, Social Movements Studies, Theory and Society, and International Journal of Urban and Regional Research.Graeme Hayes is a reader in political sociology at Aston University in the United Kingdom. His most recent book is Breaking Laws: Violence and Civil Disobedience in Protest (2019).Anneleen Kenis is a lecturer in Human Geography at King's College London. She wrote this piece while enjoying a visiting scholarship at the University of Cambridge funded by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO). Her current research deals with the role of time and temporal discourses in (de)politicizing climate change.Louise Knops is a postdoctoral researcher at the Université Catholique de Louvain and the Vrije Universiteit Brussel. She completed her PhD dissertation on the topic of political indignation, and her research interests range from affect and emotions to social movements studies and climate change politics.Sam Law is a doctoral candidate in cultural anthropology at the University of Texas at Austin. His work explores autonomous political practices and urban precarity in Mexico City.Sherilyn MacGregor is professor of environmental politics at the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. She is editor of the Routledge Handbook of Gender and Environment (2017) and a coauthor of the policy roadmap for a feminist green new deal for the United Kingdom (2021).Vanessa Nava studies philosophy at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Interested in French epistemology and political philosophy, she is currently researching autonomous conceptions of health based on the works of Ivan Illich, Georges Canguilhem, and Michel Foucault.Katherine Nelson is a teaching and doctoral fellow in philosophy at DePaul University in Chicago.Idris Robinson is an assistant professor in the Department of Philosophy at Texas State University. His treatise on the nationwide rebellion of the summer 2020, “How It Might Should Be Done,” appeared in the collection The George Floyd Uprising (2022). He is currently completing a book manuscript on the ontological status of paradigms and their role in the logical morphology of Ludwig Wittgenstein.Stephanie Wakefield is assistant professor and director of Human Ecology at Life University in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Her work critically analyzes the political and technical dimensions of climate adaptation experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".