SigT: An Efficient End-to-End MIMO-OFDM Receiver Framework Based on Transformer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multiple-input multiple-output and orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (MIMO-OFDM) are the key technologies in 4G and subsequent wireless communication systems. Conventionally, the MIMO-OFDM receiver is performed by multiple cascaded blocks with different functions and the algorithm in each block is designed based on ideal assumptions of wireless channel distributions. However, these assumptions may fail in practical complex wireless environments. The deep learning (DL) method has the ability to capture key features from complex and huge data. In this paper, a novel end-to-end MIMO-OFDM receiver framework based on transformer, named SigT, is proposed. By regarding the signal received from each antenna as a token of the transformer, the spatial correlation of different antennas can be learned and the critical zero-shot problem can be mitigated. Furthermore, the proposed SigT framework can work well without the inserted pilots, which improves the useful data transmission efficiency. Experiment results show that SigT achieves much higher performance in terms of signal recovery accuracy than benchmark methods, even in a low SNR environment or with a small number of training samples. Code is available at https://github.com/SigTransformer/SigT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".