MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Framework for Real-time Remote ECG Monitoring and Diagnoses

2022· article· en· W4320011089 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed O. Badr, Khalid Elgazzar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftware deploymentComputer scienceWearable computerMedical diagnosisAnalyticsTelehealthScalabilityRemote patient monitoringHealth careDomain (mathematical analysis)TelemedicineData scienceComputer securityEmbedded systemDatabaseSoftware engineeringMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enabled by the fast development of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies in recent years, the healthcare domain has witnessed significant advancements in wearable devices that seamlessly collect vital medical information. With the availability of IoT devices serving the healthcare domain, extraordinary amounts of sensory data are generated in real-time, requiring immediate diagnoses and attention in critical medical conditions. The provision of remote patient monitoring (RPM) and analytics infrastructure proved to be fundamental components of the healthcare domain during the Coronavirus pandemic. Traditional healthcare services are digitized and offered virtually, where patients are monitored and managed remotely without the need to go to hospitals. This paper presents a comprehensive RPM framework for real-time telehealth operations with scalable data monitoring, real-time analytics and decision-making, fine-grained data access and robust notification mechanisms in emergencies and critical health conditions. We focus on the overall framework architecture, enabling technologies integration, various system-level integrations and deployment options. Furthermore, we provide a use case application for patients with chronic heart conditions for real-time electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring. We are releasing the framework as open-source software to the active research community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207