Performance Evaluation of the Webcam-Based Contactless Respiratory Rate Monitoring System
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Continuous monitoring of the respiratory rate is necessary, particularly for patients stationed in the hospital's wards, to assure their physical conditions are medically controlled.We tested the developed webcam-based contactless respiratory rate monitoring system on twenty healthy volunteer human subjects (age 20-25 years old) who provided informed consent to participate in the research.Subjects are asked to breathe with the breath rate following the guiding flash lamps emitted from mobile phones at specific rates.Results show that the developed system is capable of measuring respiratory rate with an average error of 0-2% and with an average coefficient of variance (COV) of 0-5% among all subjects tested and for all ranges of respiratory rates investigated.These results are quite promising for further use of this system as an accurate and precise continuous respiratory rate monitoring system in clinical settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it