MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preface

2023· article· en· W4320014274 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobePersonalizationMass customizationClothingTable of contentsTextileTable (database)Political scienceBusinessManagementPublic relationsLibrary scienceEngineeringEngineering managementMarketingWorld Wide WebComputer scienceHistoryPsychologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 8 th Edition of International Conference on Intelligent Textiles and Mass Customization (ITMC 2022), which was held at the beautiful city of Montreal (Canada), from the 21st to the 23rd of September 2021, targeted guests from various branches and disciplines related to the textile industry. Its interdisciplinary approach is the key to maximizing the potential and development of textile materials and tools for various applications. The purpose of the conference is to explore new ideas, effective solutions and collaborative partnerships for business growth by catalyzing the creation of a beneficial synergy between designers, manufacturers, suppliers and end users of all sectors and making full use of this potential. The International Conference on Intelligent Textiles and Mass Customization (ITMC) meets every two years, where the organization rotates among the 5 coordinating countries (Belgium, Canada, France, Japan and Morocco). On behalf of the Conference organizers, we are honored to invite all interested business, research institutions and organizations from around the globe to participate in a lively exchange of ideas and experiences featured at the ITMC2022 Conference. ITMC conference themes are axed on intelligent textiles and mass customization. During two days, Inspiring speakers from industries, academies, governments and societies have shined the light over new chances and challenges, bringing global statistics and success stories about cutting edge science and technology. The innovation brought to the table of discussion will bloom through cooperation, policy, education and training and rise via an outstanding interaction between speakers and participants, guaranteed through Novel IT tools. Participants were also invited to show their prototypes during the Smart Textiles Salon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and EngineeringSame topicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207