Domain Discrepancy-Guided Contrastive Feature Learning for Few-Shot Industrial Fault Diagnosis Under Variable Working Conditions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent advances in data-driven methods have significantly promoted intelligent fault diagnostics for varied industrial applications. However, due to the limitations of machine fault data and the varied scenarios in the context of industrial working conditions, existing diagnostic models can hardly achieve satisfactory results. In this article, we propose a domain discrepancy-guided contrastive feature learning framework for few-shot fault diagnosis under varied working conditions. Unlike the conventional contrastive learning paradigm using manually augmented data, a sample pairs construction is implemented based on the differences between domain distributions for data acquired under different working conditions. The similarity contrast learns the domain-invariant features from a small number of sample pairs. The learned fault features can then be used for fault identification without parameter fine-tuning. In two case studies, we validated the performance of the proposed framework with small training samples under varying speeds, loads, and significant noises. Compared with the state-of-the-art methods, the proposed solution achieved higher diagnostic accuracy for the targeted applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it