MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320020205 · doi:10.20961/shes.v5i4.68980

Predictions of Food Security Based on Land Requirements in Sukoharjo Regency in 2032

2022· article· id· W4320020205 on OpenAlexaff
Rita Noviani, Rahning Utomowati, Aditya Eka Saputra, Istiyanti Nur Marfu’ah

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Humanities and Educational Studies (SHEs) Conference Series · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Development and Management
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood securityUrban sprawlForestryGeographyLand useBiologyAgricultureEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urbanisasi memberikan banyak dampak pada suatu wilayah salah satunya adalah terjadinya fenomena urban Sprawl yang berdampak pada wilayah pinggiran kota. Kabupaten Sukoharjo sebagai salah satu Wilayah Peri Urban (WPU) yang terdampak dari perkembangan Kota Surakarta mengalami peningkatan jumlah penduduk dan diproyeksikan akan terus meningkat sampai tahun 2032. Hal ini menyebabkan semakin sempitnya lahan pertanian yang akan berdampak pada tingkat ketahanan pangan di wilayah tersebut. Melalui proyeksi penduduk dan pemodelan penggunaan lahan tahun 2032 berbasis cellular automata dilakukan perhitungan kebutuhan lahan setara beras sebagai upaya untuk memprediksi tingkat ketahanan pangan Kabupaten Sukoharjo di tahun 2032 mendatang. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan diketahui bahwa tingkat ketahanan pangan Kabupaten Sukoharjo tahun 2032 diprediksi akan mengalami defisit pangan diseluruh Kecamatan, kondisi ini tentunya memerlukan perhatian khusus dari pemerintah sebagai upaya prefentif agar ketahanan pangan di Kabupaten Sukoharjo tetap terjaga dan dapat mencapai tingkat swasembada pangan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocial Humanities and Educational Studies (SHEs) Conference SeriesSame topicAgricultural Development and ManagementFrench-language works237,207