MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320023601 · doi:10.34031/es.2022.2.001

Evaluation of the reduction of the fees for the consumption of electricity when the half-hour maximum reduces

2022· article· en· W4320023601 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ahmad Alzakkar, Elena Gracheva

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Systems · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicEnergy Efficiency and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectricityConsumption (sociology)Mains electricityQuarter (Canadian coin)Environmental economicsProduction (economics)Energy consumptionReduction (mathematics)Energy (signal processing)BusinessEnergy supplyElectric potential energyElectricity generationElectric energy consumptionPower (physics)Operations managementElectric energyEconomicsMicroeconomicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to high prices for energy resources, the energy component in the cost of production can be very significant and reach 60% or more at energy-intensive industrial enterprises. To reduce it, it is necessary not only to rationally use energy resources, develop and implement measures to save them, but also correctly declare the expected indicators of electricity consumption for the billing period (month, quarter, year), which are indicated in the contract with the energy supply organization for supply of electrical energy. This paper shows the calculation of the reduced costs; assessment of the reduction in fees for electricity consumption with a decrease in the half-hour maximum; assessment of damage in the regulation of maximum power.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy SystemsSame topicEnergy Efficiency and ManagementFrench-language works237,207