MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preserving Privacy Integration and Mining for Big Temporal Co-occurrence Patterns

2022· article· en· W4320024165 on OpenAlex
Anifat M. Olawoyin, Carson K. Leung

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsTransparency (behavior)Big dataInformation privacyComputer scienceInternet privacyData integrationPrivacy lawHierarchyOpen dataComputer securityData sciencePrivacy policyData miningWorld Wide WebPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Privacy policy, terms of use, public consent, reusable data, and transparency are trending words associated with the world wide web data such that privacy is now the responsibility of all stakeholders. Although privacy is a concern, integrating publicly available data may be for social good. For instance, integrating emergency calls, substance use, and overdose antagonist drug may help inform policies relating to emergency resources allocation, substance overdose antagonist drug distribution, and spiral effect of reducing overdose death. Hence, in this paper, we examine privacy preserving integration of public open data in the hierarchy of time and space. Our experimental result on four open datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of temporal and location hierarchy model in preserving privacy integration of big temporal co-occurrence data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0750.153
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.387
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.002 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it