MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Big Data Analysis and Calculation on Occupant Protection Based on Intelligent Sled Test System in Passenger Car

2022· article· en· W4320026570 on OpenAlexaff
Wu Yongqiang, Chen Chao

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE Conference on Telecommunications, Optics and Computer Science (TOCS) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Applied Research
Canadian institutions123 Certification (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHead (geology)Automotive engineeringTest (biology)Computer scienceTest dataEngineeringSimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GB 11552-2009 is one of the important standards for testing the interior fittings of the passenger car, while its judgment method is only to verify whether the dummy’s head is in contact with the instrument panel, and other parts of the dummy are not examined. In order to further improve the GB 11552 and better protect the occupants, dummy injury of 60 tests for 20 vehicle models is studied and analyzed based on the sled test method in this paper. Test results show that the occupant’s head, trunk and lower limbs are damaged to different degrees. Therefore, it is suggested that the injury of the dummy other parts should be taken into account in the later revision of GB 11552.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score0.737

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE Conference on Telecommunications, Optics and Computer Science (TOCS)Same topicEngineering Applied ResearchFrench-language works237,207