MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320027388 · doi:10.35493/medu.42.6

Bipolar Disorder

2022· article· en· W4320027388 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jacqueline Chen, Dalraj Dhillon

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Meducator · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBipolar Disorder and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypomaniaBipolar disorderManiaBipolar II disorderPsychologyPsychiatryPopulationMoodMajor depressive disorderBipolar I disorderPrevalence of mental disordersDepression (economics)Clinical psychologyMedicineAnxiety

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bipolar disorder (BD), previously known as “manic depressive illness,” is a recurrent chronic disorder characterised by mood and energy-state fluctuations. People who have BD comprise more than 1% of the world’s population from all nationalities, ethnic origins, and socioeconomic statuses. There are four different types of bipolar-related disorders: bipolar disorder I, bipolar disorder II, cyclothymic disorder, and unspecified BD, which are classified by different patterns of manic, hypomanic, and depressive episodes. Where manic and hypomanic episodes are both states of increased activity, energy, or agitation, hypomanic episodes only last around four consecutive days and are less severe compared to manic episodes, which last around one week. Depressive episodes are characterised by feelings of despair and a loss of interest in previously enjoyed activities. Like many other psychological disorders, BD is often difficult to diagnose accurately in clinical practice due to large variations in individual symptoms, symptom overlap, or lack of approved biomarkers. Additionally, because many patients with BD only seek treatment for depressive episodes, many BD patients are initially misdiagnosed. Two studies conducted in 1999 and 2000 found that nearly 40% of patients with BD are initially diagnosed with unipolar depression. Previous diagnosis criteria for the types of BD were also overly restrictive. For example, according to the 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-4) criteria, bipolar disorder II requires an episode of mania or hypomania lasting four days, even though many experts believe that the average duration of the hypomanic state ranges between one to three days. Moreover, it is often difficult to elicit a past history of hypomanic episodes from patients because of its milder presentation. For many patients, the increased energy and activity experienced during hypomanic episodes may not even be considered negative, and thus will go unreported. Currently, the DSM-5 contains the most widely acknowledged diagnostic classifications for bipolar disorder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.557

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1670.076

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe MeducatorSame topicBipolar Disorder and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207