Robust Photogrammetry-Based Online Pose Correction of Industrial Robots Employing Adaptive Integral Terminal Fractional-Order Super-Twisting Algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a novel adaptive robust control scheme is proposed for pose correction of eye-to-hand photogrammetry-based industrial robots subject to uncertainties. The proposed method uses two control loops: internal and external loops. The former is the dynamic controller designed for controlling the robot’s joints. The external loop is the kinematic controller to correct the pose error using the estimated end-effector’s pose acquired by the photogrammetry sensor (in this research C-track AMETEK). An adaptive integral terminal fractional-order super-twisting algorithm (AITFOSTA) is developed and employed for both control loops. AITFOSTA is an integral sliding mode controller (ISMC) whose nominal control law is a terminal one and its switching part is replaced with a fractional-order super-twisting algorithm (FOSTA), reducing the chattering to a great extent while rejecting the uncertainties. Additionally, an adaptive uncertainty and disturbance estimator based on radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) is designed and used as a compensator to reduce the uncertainty bounds, contributing to further chattering reduction. The stability analysis of the proposed controller is also presented. Experimental results on a PUMA200 industrial robot show superiority of the proposed method over other well-known approaches by reaching an unprecedented tracking accuracy, i.e., 0.06 mm and 0.18 deg for position and orientation, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".