MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dynamic Context-Aware Security in a Tactical Network Using Attribute-Based Encryption

2022· article· en· W4320031251 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMILCOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSecurity in Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceInteroperabilityEncryptionEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionContext (archaeology)Overhead (engineering)Network topologyComputer networkComputer securityDistributed computingTelecommunicationsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of context-aware environmental monitoring systems is growing in several areas. However, the tactical edge networks present an extremely challenging and heterogeneous networking environment due to the complexity of the dynamic topologies of the battlefields. Installed devices in battlefields can be used to guarantee system performance and interoperability in such continuously varying network conditions. This work presented a Dynamic Context-Aware Security model in a Tactical Network that uses the data collected by the IoT sensors to provide automated policies for the dissemination of network state information. Moreover, our model leverages Attribute-Based Encryption (ABE) to ensure data security, hence secured communication. The proposed approach is validated through experiments in real-time. The achieved results show the effectiveness of our model in reducing the communication overhead associated with varying network conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.296
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0090.004
Research integrity0.0000.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it