MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320036799 · doi:10.51731/cjht.2023.572

Design, Rationale, and Preliminary Results of the Canadian Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia Registry: 2008 to 2022 Update

2023· article· en· W4320036799 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Leslie Brown, Isabelle L. Ruel, Alexis Baass, Jean Bergeron, Liam R. Brunham, Lubomira Cermakova, Patrick Couture, Daniel Gaudet, Gordon A. Francis, Robert A. Hegele, Iulia Iatan, G.B. John Mancini, Brian W. McCrindle, Thomas Ransom, Mark Sherman, Ruth McPherson, Jacques Genest

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Health Technologies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsFamilial hypercholesterolemiaMedicinePatient registryOrphan drugDiseaseAtherosclerotic cardiovascular diseaseDisease registryApheresisPediatricsIntensive care medicineCholesterolFamily medicineInternal medicineBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is an orphan disease characterized by extreme elevations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in the blood and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Untreated, survival beyond 30 years is rare. The Canadian HoFH Registry was created by clinicians from across Canada to understand the burden of disease, current treatments, outcomes, and costs to society. The registry will be used to inform decisions for access to specialized therapies, such as LDL apheresis and orphan medications. To date, 79 cases of HoFH have been identified across the country, and 52 patients from 5 provinces have been enrolled.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.068
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.079
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0680.079
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.009
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Health TechnologiesSame topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthFrench-language works237,207