MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4320036833 · doi:10.53350/pjmhs20221612603

Trying Modified Approaches to the Management of Pregnancy Induced Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) a Prospective Study

2022· article· en· W4320036833 on OpenAlexaff
Zia Ullah, Sabeena Umer, Bilal Habib, Farukh Bashir, Shazia Roman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsContinental (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGestational diabetesPregnancyDiabetes mellitusObstetricsObservational studyProspective cohort studyBlood sugarPediatricsGestationSurgeryInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: To investigate maternal and foetal outcomes in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed according to the criteria of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG), but who were evaluated using a twenty-four hour seven-value sugar profile prior to the implementation of management. This study sought to examine maternal and fetal outcomes in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. Place of Study: Sialkot Medical College Sialkot Duration of Study: JUNE 2021 TO JUNE2022 Methods: This prospective observational study was undertaken at the Sialkot Medical College Hospital over the course of one year. The hospital served as the study's location. Prior to starting any medication between 24 and 28 weeks of pregnancy, women diagnosed with GDM based on IADPSG criteria were needed to undertake a seven-value sugar profile within twenty-four hours. This criterion applied to women diagnosed with gestational diabetes between 24 and 28 weeks of pregnancy. The remaining patients were treated with medical nutrition therapy (MNT), which may or may not have been supplemented with medication depending on what was necessary to maintain their normal blood sugar levels. Documentation and analysis of maternal and fetal outcomes were conducted to assess whether or not the groups displayed differentiating characteristics. Results: GDM was diagnosed in 198 out of a total of 1867 pregnant women, representing a 9.1% prevalence rate. In 81 patients, or 40.90% of the total, the 7-point blood glucose profile (ITT) was normal, and these individuals required no medical intervention other than watchful observation. Other patients received treatment; 89 (44.9% of patients) required only MNT control, while 19 (9.59%) received supplementary medication in the form of metformin and 9 (4.5%) required insulin. It was determined that there were no statistically significant differences between the treated and untreated groups in terms of maternal–fetal outcomes. Upon comparing treated and untreated groups, this was the result that was reached. Conclusions: After an abnormal Oral Glucose Tolerance Test, the technique of evaluating patients with a seven-value, twenty-four-hour sugar profile limited the capacity of nearly one-third of women to get medication and treatment for GDM without compromising maternal–fetal outcomes. This was the case despite the absence of a link between an aberrant OGT and a diminished capacity to receive therapy and treatment for GDM. Keywords: GDM IADPSG Maternal fetal outcomes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGestational Diabetes Research and Management→French-language works237,207→