MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Przemiany dworców w miejskiej przestrzeni publicznej. Przykład Kielc

2022· article· pl· W4320064457 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePrace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG · 2022
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Development and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsAgribrands Purina (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

W ostatnich latach zauważa się ożywienie związane ze wzrostem liczby modernizowanych i remontowanych obiektów dworcowych. Na nowo odkrywa się też ich dużą wartość jako obiektów wielofunkcyjnych. W związku z tym celem badań było określenie przemian dworca miejskiego w przestrzeni publicznej na przykładzie takich obiektów zlokalizowanych w Kielcach. Zwrócono głównie uwagę na przekształcenia architektoniczne, przestrzenne i funkcjonalne. Badaniu poddano zmodernizowany w 2020 r. dworzec autobusowy, a także dworzec kolejowy, będący w trakcie modernizacji. Jak ukazano na tych przykładach, główna rola dworców – mimo zastosowania nowoczesnych koncepcji modernizacyjnych – została zachowana. Dworzec autobusowy wkomponowany jest w krajobraz miasta poprzez zachowanie oryginalnej i wyjątkowej kompozycji przestrzennej oraz sylwety gmachu. Powstały układ przestrzenny wzmacnia znaczenie i potencjał funkcji publicznych, a także walorów użytkowych dla podróżnych oraz mieszkańców miasta. W podobnym kierunku zmierza modernizacja kieleckiego dworca kolejowego. Transformations of stations in urban public space. The example of Kielce In recent years, there has been a revival associated with an increase in the number of modernised and renovated station facilities. Their great value as multifunctional facilities is also being rediscovered. Therefore the aim of the research was to determine the transformations of stations in public space based on the examples of such facilities located in Kielce. Main attention was placed on architectural, spatial and functional transformations. The study covered the bus station modernised in 2020, as well as the railway station which is currently under modernisation. As shown in these examples, the main role of the stations – despite the use of modern refurbishment concepts – has been retained. The bus station is integrated into the city landscape by preserving the original and unique spatial composition and silhouette of the building. The resulting spatial arrangement strengthens the importance and potential of public functions, as well as utility values for travelers and city residents. The modernisation of the Kielce railway station is heading in a similar direction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0090.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it