MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4320065613 · doi:10.1289/isee.2022.o-op-175

A cohort study of the multi-pollutant effects of PM2.5, NO2, and O3 on C-reactive protein levels during pregnancy

2022· article· en· W4320065613 on OpenAlexaffabout
Priyanka Gogna, Michael M. Borghese, Paul J. Villeneuve, Premkumari Kumarathasan, Markey Johnson, Robin Shutt, Jillian Ashley‐Martin, Maryse F. Bouchard, Will D. King

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineCarleton UniversityHealth CanadaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterquartile rangePregnancyPollutantMedicineC-reactive proteinInternal medicineChemistryInflammationBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aim Individual air pollutants and green space are associated with inflammation in pregnancy, but their combined effects are not well understood. Our objective was to study the multipollutant effects of PM2.5, NO2, and O3 on C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in maternal blood (a marker of inflammation implicated in adverse pregnancy outcomes). Methods We analyzed data collected from 1,170 pregnant Canadian women enrolled in the MIREC Study. Maternal blood concentrations of CRP were measured in the third trimester. Residentially-based ambient concentrations of PM2.5, NO2, and O3 during the 14 days prior to blood draw were estimated using satellite-derived concentrations and land use regression models. Green space was measured using the Normalized Difference Vegetative Index (NDVI). We fit multipollutant linear regression models using 14-day average estimates of PM2.5, NO2, and O3. We also evaluated the effects of pollutant mixtures using Weighted Quantile Sum Regression (WQSR), and by calculating the Air Quality Health Index (AQHI), a Canadian risk communication tool that derives a weighted average of the pollutants. Results In multipollutant models that included NO2 and O3, each interquartile range (IQR) increase in 14-day average PM2.5 (IQR: 6.9 µg/m3) was associated with 27.1% (95% CI: 6.2, 50.7) higher CRP concentrations. In air pollution mixture models, each IQR increase in AQHI was associated with 37.7% (95% CI: 13.9, 66.5) higher CRP levels; and an IQR increase in the WQSR was associated with 78.6% (95% CI: 29.7, 146.0) higher CRP levels. Associations between air pollution and CRP were not confounded or modified by NDVI. Conclusions We provide evidence for stronger effects of the combined mixture of PM2.5, NO2, and O3 on inflammation levels during pregnancy compared with individual pollutants. This research emphasizes the importance of examining multipollutant analyses in future investigations. Keywords PM2.5, NO2, O3, green space, C-reactive protein, pregnancy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.525
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207